Region : South Asia (ex-modern India)
Catalogue Title : Stanley Gibbons
Commonwealth Stamp Catalogue : Bangladesh, Burma, Pakistan &
Sri Lanka, 3th ed
Publisher : Stanley Gibbons LTD,
Ringwood, UK (2015)
Format : Soft Cover, 234 pages,
170mmx240mm, color illustrations
Breakdown of Page Length By Nation
- Bangladesh – 44 pages
- Burma – 7 pages
- Pakistan – 76 pages
- Sri Lanka/Ceylon – 99 pages
Language of Text : English
Price : UK£21.95 (per publisher's
website
https://www.stanleygibbons.com/store/StanleyGibbons/publications-accessories
)
For collectors of South Asia, Gibbons
remains the authority of record for most. This extends not only to
the issues of the colonial era, but also to the post-colonial states
that came into being after the withdrawal of British hegemony in the
region in 1947-1948. This catalog represent the philatelic issues of
those regions of South Asia that were either neither part of the
British Raj (Ceylon, colonial Burma after 1937) or the successor
states to the Raj other than India that remained in the Commonwealth
of Nations (Pakistan, Bangladesh and post-colonial Ceylon/Sri Lanka,
which was NEVER part of the Raj administration during the philatelic
era). I will deal with the volume covering Raj and post-Raj India in
a future post.
As good as the SG catalogue is for this
region, the catalogue does have a couple weakenesses, part of which
are due to editorial decisions made by Gibbons, others due more to
the interest of Western
philatelists as a whole.
Review Of The Catalogue and Comparison
with Scott
While not the largest of catalogues, as
with all other volumes in the Commonwealth series the amount of
information crammed into this catalogue is immense. For purposes of
this review, I am going to split the discussion along national lines
Bangladesh
Created in wake of the Pakistani civil
war of 1971, the philatelic issues of Bangladesh are fairly
straight-forward and presented as such in the Gibbons catalogue. Not
a huge amount of difference with the coverage in the Scott general
stamp catalogue, just a few additional varieties here and there.
One issue that neither Gibbons nor
Scott deal with are the numerous provisional overprints that were
produced in liberated areas of Bangladesh during the course of and
immediate aftermath of the civil war and Indian military
intervention. I find this area fascinating as a record of the
dramatic political upheaval of the time and had hoped that Gibbons at
least would provide a bit of information as to what was produced, but
alas the only mention in Gibbons, as in Scott, is an introductory
note.
Note in Gibbons regarding Bangladesh provisionals
One can argue that given the
provisional nature of these overprints it would be very challenging
for a catalogue like Gibbons to sort out legitimate versus
philatelic-inspired productions. In the end though, I think this
really represents a degree of myopia among collectors overall, who
tend to focus more towards the issues of the classical era at the
expense of further study of varieties and special issues of the
post-1945 era. This is an issue I will return to shortly, but I
think it bears keeping in mind that especially for non-Western
nations, coverage of varieties within modern (post-1945) issues tends
to be somewhat less thorough that the coverage of pre-1945 issues.
And this, in large part, is due to what has been a lack of research
on these issues by dedicated philatelists outside a small number
within the nation concerned. Hopefully as philately becomes more
popular in non-Western societies as economic conditions create a new
class that has the resources to engage in hobbies, this dearth of
information can be rectified.
Burma
Gibbons coverage of Burma in this
catalogue illustrates one of my issues with how Gibbons organizes its
catalogues. I understand very well that the catalogues are dedicated
to the issues of the Commonwealth and their imperial colonial
predecessors. However, I really do not like the fact that for those
nations, such as Burma, which decided NOT to remain in the
Commonwealth after independence was granted, coverage in the
Commonwealth catalogues is halted and the post-independence issues
are placed in a separate catalogue. Thus, for collectors of Burma,
one will need to purchase TWO catalogues in the Gibbons line rather
than one to have complete coverage (**or at least that is my belief,
it may be that the colonial era issues are covered in Gibbons
Southeast Asia volume to the same degree they are in the
Commonwealth series of catalogues.)
Having said that, one has to say that
when it comes to the colonial era, no catalogue holds a catalogue to
the degree of listings that Gibbons has for Burma. Even the Scott
Specialized 1840-1940 catalogue is less than thorough.
Gibbons listings for Burma at end of colonial era
And this thoroughness extends to the
issues of the Japanese occupation of Burma during the Second World
War, where the listings in the Scott Speciailized catalogue seem very
basic in comparison.
Gibbons vs Scott Specialized listings for Burma under Japanese occupation
If you restrict your interest to the
colonial era, then the coverage of Burma in this catalogue is
EXCELLENT. However, those who want information on the post-colonial
era will need to source the Gibbons Southeast Asia catalogue.
Pakistan
Much like its coverage of Bangladesh,
Gibbons coverage of the issues of Pakistan tend to be, to a degree,
uneven. Much like what would happen in Bangladesh in 1971, at the
time of Partition in 1947 postal official in those areas which would
become Pakistan produced numerous provisional overprints, many of
which were on an ad-hoc basis as supplies of the centrally-produced
Pakistan overprints either ran out or were delayed in transit or lost
in the social upheaval that would tear much of the Pakistan-India
border apart. Again though, Gibbons (as well as Scott) only
provide a note, with Gibbons noting that while the issues are “of
philatelic interest,” they “lay beyond the scope of the
catalogue”.
With the establishment of a more stable
situation in Pakistan, the early years would see the production of
some gorgeous issues, including definitive issues with a good number
of varieties of perforations and shades. Gibbons does a great job
listing these, providing yet again more depth than what Scott
provides in its general catalogue.
Gibbons vs Scott listings of the early issues of Pakistan.
Unfortunately, this deeper coverage of
varieties that starts off well in Gibbons with the issues of the
1950s and 1960s is not maintained in terms of coverage for later
definitive issues. This is really not a fault of Gibbons per-se.
Western collectors have in general not focused much philatelic
research on printing varieties of series, especially definitive
series, produced by developing nations after the late 1960s. In part
this is due to a lack of information from the Post Offices
themselves, which were trying to gain the ability to produce their
own postage stamps locally and learning to master the new technolgies
that Western postal administrations spent much of the 1960s trying to
master.
Another factor that has limited our
understanding of printing varieties in modern issues from developing
nations has been the reality that the philatelic communities in these
nations post-independence have tended to be small, and to a degree
more interested in the philately of the colonial era rather than the
present day. This trend has been changing since the early 1990s,
however. Increased wealth in some nations has created new middle
classes with an income to spare on hobbies and an interest in the
philatelic history of their nations post-colonial era.
Gibbons listing of the 1980s fort definitives vs Siddiqui's specialized online listing
One can see the difference when one
compares Gibbons to the listings in a catalogue from the nation in
question. For example, the Pakistan Fort definitives in the late
1980s in Gibbons and from the online philatelic catalgoue pakistanphilately.com (an online version of a catalogue produced by
AI Siddiqui and previously published in hard copy in Pakistan). Siddiqui also provides information regarding print runs, value of First Day Cover (in Pakistani Rupees) and more.
My hope is that with the greater
interconnection of collectors around the world possible via the
internet, more research into the printing varieties of series
produced by developing nations will become available and, in the
course of time, receive listings in the main Western catalogues such
as the Gibbons Commonwealth Specialized.
Ceylon-Sri Lanka
Of the four nations covered in this
catalogue, the best coverage is provided for Ceylon (renamed Sri
Lanka in 1972). Having remained a member of the Commonwealth, all of
its issues to the present are listed, and the coverage of colonial
era Ceylon is very, very in-depth. Comparing the listings in Gibbons
for the later George V definitives with Scott's coverage of the same
issues in the Classic Specialized is to a degree akin to comparing
apples and oranges. Scott clearly has some catching-up to do in
regards to Ceylon if it wants its Classic Specialized to be a true
rival to Gibbons.
Gibbons vs Scott Specialized coverage of Ceylon George V issues, advantage Gibbons
Gibbons and Scott are to a degree more
comparable when it comes to the the post-independence issues of
Ceylon and, later Sri Lanka. Gibbons does list some varieties in the
1950s definitives that Scott does not, but overall the two catalogues
compare well. Sri Lanka after 1972 seems not to have produced as
much in the way of varieties on different series, in particular
definitive series, that can be seen in Pakistan. In part this may be
due to most of Sri Lanka's stamps being produced in other nations,
but I do have a bit of a suspicion that again there may not have been
a lot of research done on these definitive issues to create a full
picture of the printing changes many of the longer-running definitive
series quite likely had.
Ceylon and Sri Lanka back of the book stamps in Gibbons, nowhere to be seen in Scott (as of 2015).
And to serve as the exclamation point
in terms of the depth of coverage Gibbons does provide for Ceylon/Sri
Lanka, it includes back of the book material for both eras that are
not included in either the 2012 Scott General catalogue or the 2015
Scott Specialized. From colonial Ceylon telegraph stamps to Sri
Lanka postal-fiscals from the 1980s and 1990s, the Gibbons catalogue
listings provide an additional element for the collector to add to
their collections of this fascinating island that collectors
dependent on the Scott catalogues would not really know existed.
Conclusions
For many collectors, interest in South
Asian philately has for a long time been focused on the colonial era,
with independence in 1947-1948 usually seen as the end point and the
issues post-1948 as more the realm of topical collectors and the
packet trade. Yet over the past couple decades that view has changed
as South Asia has gone through an economic growth spurt. Most are
familiar with India's transformation, and already this is having an
impact on the value of post-colonial issues, especially those of the
immediate post-independence years. Similar economic transformations
have been ocurring in the other areas of South Asia, from Islamabad
to Dacca and down to Colombo. To me, South Asia represents a very
interesting philatelic frontier, with much philatelic research still
possible in understanding some of the longer-running definitive
issues and the challenges of adapting new printing technologies to
keep up with demand for postage stamps from consumers.
To a degree then the Gibbons catalogue
represents a good introduction point to these issues. But it must be
kept in mind that in some respects, Gibbons is still not the
complete authority all eras of philately in this region, the
post-colonial era in particular. Pakistan and India both have
locally produced specialized catalogues, and as the research of AI
Siddiqui and others on the pakistanphilately.com website
illustrates, there is a growing body of philatelic research coming
from the region regarding not just contemporary postal issues, but
new interpretations regarding colonial-era postal issues.